The Danger of Angels

and Demons

 

From the latest LA box office tally, it looks like Dan Brown has scored another blockbuster hit. Once again he's done it at the expense of the Catholic Church.  Like The Da Vinci Code, Angels and Demons plays off what seems to be the last acceptable prejudice in the America: anti-Catholicism.

 

The danger of Angels and Demons is that it preys upon those weak of faith and ignorant of history. To make his story believable, Brown makes factual assertions that just aren't true. Presented as credible it's too easy for the viewer to believe that they are. Though they may be nothing but historical fiction, they become accepted as historical fact.

 

Take the allegation that Pope Urban rejected The Ecstasy of St. Theresa as too sexually explicit. Bernini, its creator, didn't begin working on it until several years after Urban died.

 

Take the issue of Copernicus. Kohler states the church murdered him for revealing scientific truths. But Copernicus actually died from stroke complications in 1543, shortly after he published De Revolutionibus Orbium. There is no evidence he was murdered. He actually dedicated his work to the Pope, and never suffered any personal reproach or persecution.

 

Take Langdon's accusation that "religion has always persecuted science". He testifies that "a deep rift has existed between science and religion since the beginning of history". But scholars of "non-fictional" history could easily make the case that modern science could not have come into being without the influence of Christian theology and philosophy, or the support of the Catholic Church.

 

Unlike presented, Galileo was no key player in the Illuminati, the world's first scientific "think tank". The Illuminati had no interest in scientific research. And, Galileo had no interest in the Illuminati,since they didn't exist until well over 100 years after his death.

 

Though Brown claims to have conducted extensive research, Angels and Demons is full of many such errors, false facts and misrepresentations.

 

There are scholarly refutations on dedicated websites over the internet that deal with them. There are good books written by experts dedicated to doing the same.

 

But the fact remains, far too many of us, rely on the history presented in movies to form our own sense of history. There always seems to be History Channel special, like Angels and Demons Decoded, that helps promote a controversial movie. (Its premise becomes plausible because its given prime time stage and extensive argument.)

 

The fact remains, far too many of us lack the maturity or the ability to discern fact from fiction. (For years I thought the exodus happened exactly as it did in The Ten Commandments with Charlton Heston.)  Teachers use Hollywood movies to teach history everyday, including those of the historical fiction genre. (Each of those teach the bias of its writer, director and producer.)

 

Depending upon how impressionable we may be, what's wrong takes root as what's right (especially if what's wrong get first crack.)  What's false has to be pulled before what's true can be planted. Nowadays the accused is guilty until proven innocent, especially if one possesses any shred of prejudice against the targeted. If smear tactics on mass media didn't sway votes they wouldn't be part of presidential campaigns.

 

Hollywood continues to condition us Catholics to be ashamed of things in our history.  (Thanks toKingdom of Heaven we can never look at the crusades the same way again. Doubt still continues to cast doubt about the extent of priestly pedophilia.) There always  seems to be a movie or TV episodes that casts dispersions on Catholics. We need to have the faith and fortitude to see them for what they really are.

 

Brown has a qualifying statement on the first page of the both The Da Vinci Code and Angels and Demons that claims content of his work to be factual.

 

I think the Catholic Church should be given the courtesy of adding a qualifier to both Brown movies that states:" what's presented as historical fact in this movie may not be an actual or correct representation of history."

 

We warn viewers about sexual, violent and vulgar content, don't we?

 

Anybody want to sign a petition to the Motion Picture Academy of Arts and Sciences?

 

While it's being drafted, don't forget to check out whatever cast doubts about your Faith. St. Paul encourages us to question everything, St. John reminds us that the truth will set us free.

 

Here's another opportunity to study our Faith and proclaim it to those who raise questions.

 

--Rick Sikorski

 

We welcome your comments. 

 

 

 

BACK TO GCI WELCOME PAGE